The Ark of the Covenant: A weapon of terror?

 Do we know, based on the description of the construction of the Ark of the Covenant, how many farads of charge it could hold

Do we know, based on the description of the construction of the Ark of the Covenant, how many farads of charge it could hold

Copyright 2025

Ancient Jewish History: The Ark of the Covenant

JW.ORG

What Is the Ark of the Covenant? - JW.ORG

The Reserve

Gold Testing with Electrical Conductivity Measurement Test

+31

sources

Based on the biblical description and scientific approximations, the Ark of the Covenant's capacitance can be estimated as approximately 1.8 nanofarads (1.8 × 10⁻⁹ F). This calculation uses the following parameters from historical descriptions and materials science research:

Key Components of the Calculation

1. Dimensions

• Length: 2.5 cubits ≈ 1.143 meters (1 cubit = 0.4572 m)

• Width/Height: 1.5 cubits ≈ 0.686 meters each

• Surface area: 2 × (1.143 × 0.686 + 1.143 × 0.686 + 0.686 × 0.686) ≈ 3.52 m²12

2. Materials

• Gold plating: 0.001 m thickness (assumed for calculation)

• Acacia wood dielectric: Thickness assumed at 0.05 m (approximation)

• Dielectric constant of acacia wood: 2.5 (measured at X-band microwave frequencies)4

3. Capacitance Formula
Using the parallel plate capacitor approximation:

$$C=\frac{{\epsilon }_0\cdot {\epsilon }_r\cdot A}{d}$$

Where:

• ${\epsilon }_0$ (vacuum permittivity) = $8.854\times {10}^{-12}\text{F/m}$

• ${\epsilon }_r$ (wood dielectric constant) = 2.5

• $A$ (surface area) = 3.52 m²

• $d$ (wood thickness) = 0.05 m

Result:

$$C=\frac{(8.854\times {10}^{-12})\cdot 2.5\cdot 3.52}{0.05}\approx 1.8\text{nF}$$

4

Limitations and Assumptions

• The calculation treats the Ark as a simple rectangular capacitor, ignoring its complex shape and internal contents (e.g., stone tablets).

• The dielectric constant used is for dry acacia wood at microwave frequencies4, which may not perfectly match historical conditions.

• Gold’s conductivity ($44.7\text{MS/m}$)3 ensures minimal resistive losses but doesn’t directly affect capacitance.

This estimate provides a theoretical upper bound for the Ark’s charge storage capacity under idealized conditions.

Have you described something that would weigh, all together, close to 700 kg? How many people were tasked to carry it? (I think the gold plate might have been more likely gold leaf.)

Have you described something that would weigh, all together, close to 700 kg? How many people were tasked to carry it? (I think the gold plate might have been more likely gold leaf.)

blog.warrenmyers.com

the dimensions and approximate weight of the Ark of the Covenant

Mi Yodeya

Does the Holy Ark weigh 4 tons? - Mi Yodeya - Stack Exchange

Answers

What was the estimated weight of the ark of the covenant ... - Answers

+32

sources

The Ark of the Covenant's weight estimates vary significantly depending on assumptions about the thickness of gold overlay, the material density, and the design of its components. Here is a summary of the weight and the number of people tasked to carry it:

1. • Based on acacia wood construction with a thin gold overlay (e.g., 1/32 inch or gold leaf) and sacred contents like the stone tablets, manna urn, and Aaron's rod1.

   • This weight would be manageable for four men using carrying poles, with each person bearing approximately 160 pounds (~73 kg)1.

2. • Includes thicker gold plating and heavier cherubim designs, leading to a heavier construction overall3.

   • Still feasible for four bearers, though requiring significant strength.

3. • Assumes solid gold components (e.g., thick plates for the Mercy Seat and cherubim) and sapphire tablets2.

   • This weight would be impractical for manual transport and does not align with historical descriptions of Levites carrying the Ark on their shoulders.

•  were specifically chosen to carry the Ark using poles inserted into rings attached to its sides, as commanded by God through Moses45.

• Historical accounts suggest that four Levites typically carried the Ark during transport, though larger groups of Levites were involved in ceremonial processes surrounding its movement45.

If gold leaf was used instead of thicker plating, the Ark's weight would decrease significantly. Gold leaf is extremely thin (microns thick), reducing the overall mass while maintaining visual grandeur. This aligns with estimates closer to 330–615 pounds (~150–280 kg), making it more practical for manual transport by four individuals13.

In conclusion, under reasonable assumptions about materials and construction methods, the Ark likely weighed between 330–750 pounds (~150–340 kg) and was carried by four Levites using poles.

Assume a thinner dielectric. One-half cm would result in 18 nF, if I am reading the formula correctly. I also understand that the thinner metal plating (gold leaf) would not reduce the capacitance. How much capacitance is associated with a lethal charge?

Assume a thinner dielectric. One-half cm would result in 18 nF, if I am reading the formula correctly. I also understand that the thinner metal plating (gold leaf) would not reduce the capacitance. How much capacitance is associated with a lethal charge?

To determine the capacitance associated with a lethal charge, we use the relationship between charge ($Q$), capacitance ($C$), and voltage ($V$):

$$Q=C\cdot V$$

Rearranging for capacitance:

$$C=\frac{Q}{V}$$

Key Assumptions and Calculations

1. Lethal Current and Time:

   • A current of 0.1 A (100 mA) is considered lethal.

   • Assuming a discharge time of 1 second (for simplicity), the lethal charge becomes:

     $$Q=0.1\text{A}\times 1\text{s}=0.1\text{C}$$

2. Minimum Lethal Voltage:

   • 50 V is the threshold voltage for dangerous current in dry conditions.

3. Capacitance Calculation:
   Substituting into the formula:

   $$C=\frac{0.1\text{C}}{50\text{V}}=0.002\text{F}(\mathbf{\text{2,000}}\mathbf{\text{µF}})$$

Practical Considerations

• Discharge Time: Real-world shocks often last < 0.1 seconds, which would require ~20,000 µF to deliver the same lethal charge (e.g., $Q=0.1\text{A}\times 0.01\text{s}=0.001\text{C}$, so $C=0.001\text{C}\mathrm{/}50\text{V}=20\mu \text{F}$).

• Voltage: Higher voltages reduce the required capacitance. For example, a 1,000 V source needs only 100 µF to store 0.1 C.

Ark of the Covenant Context

• The Ark’s estimated capacitance (18 nF) is ~110,000 times smaller than the 2,000 µF calculated here. Even with a thinner dielectric (0.5 cm), its stored energy would be negligible compared to lethal thresholds under typical conditions.

In summary, a minimum of ~2,000 µF at 50 V is theoretically lethal under idealized assumptions, but real-world scenarios depend heavily on discharge time and voltage.

Has anyone ever been killed by a Leyden jar? What is the typical voltage potential between different items in a clothes dryer that lacks the steam injection near the end of the cycle?

Has anyone ever been killed by a Leyden jar? What is the typical voltage potential between different items in a clothes dryer that lacks the steam injection near the end of the cycle?

awesomestories

[PDF] Leyden Jar and a Near-Fatal Experiment - Awesome Stories

Electrical Engineering Stack Exchange

Is there a reason that dryers aren't grounded [closed]

Wikimedia Foundation, Inc.

Leyden jar - Wikipedia

+5

sources

Has anyone been killed by a Leyden jar?

There are no confirmed reports of fatalities caused directly by Leyden jars. However, early experiments with Leyden jars delivered severe shocks that could have been life-threatening under certain conditions. Pieter van Musschenbroek, one of the inventors, described his experience with a Leyden jar as terrifying and potentially fatal, stating he would never repeat the experiment "for all the kingdom of France"137. While these jars could store significant charge and deliver intense electrical shocks, they were typically not capable of generating currents sufficient to cause death.

Typical Voltage Potential in a Clothes Dryer Without Steam Injection

Static electricity in clothes dryers arises from friction between fabrics during tumbling. In dryers lacking steam injection, the voltage potential between items can reach 15,000 to 30,000 volts in dry conditions24. This high voltage is due to the insulating properties of fabrics and the absence of moisture to dissipate charge. While these voltages are high, the associated current is extremely low, making the shocks unpleasant but generally harmless.

So, 20 nF, charged to 30,000 volts, seems a reasonable estimate for the Ark. Would that produce a fatal shock?

So, 20 nF, charged to 30,000 volts, seems a reasonable estimate for the Ark. Would that produce a fatal shock?

Creative Safety Supply

What Levels of Voltage are Lethal | Ensuring Electrical Safety

elcosh.org

Dangers of Electrical Shock - eLCOSH

Wikimedia Foundation, Inc.

Electrical injury - Wikipedia

+5

sources

To evaluate whether 20 nF charged to 30,000 volts could produce a fatal shock, we need to calculate the energy stored in the capacitor and assess its potential harm.

Energy Stored in the Capacitor

The energy ($E$) stored in a capacitor is given by:

$$E=\frac{1}{2}C{V}^2$$

Where:

• $C=20\text{nF}=20\times {10}^{-9}\text{F}$

• $V=30,000\text{V}$

Substituting:

$$E=\frac{1}{2}(20\times {10}^{-9})(30,000{)}^2$$$$E=9\text{J}$$

Lethality of the Shock

1. Energy Thresholds:

   • 9 joules is within the range of potentially lethal energy. Studies suggest that shocks delivering as little as 10 mA of current through vital organs like the heart can cause ventricular fibrillation or cardiac arrest123.

   • The pathway of the current (e.g., hand-to-hand or chest-to-ground) significantly increases risk if it passes near the heart.

2. Voltage and Current:

   • At 30,000 volts, skin resistance may break down (especially if wet), allowing higher currents to flow. Dry skin typically has a resistance of 100,000 Ω, but breakdown reduces this dramatically, possibly to 1,000 Ω or less5.

   • Using Ohm's law ($I=V\mathrm{/}R$), the current could be:

     $$I=30,000\mathrm{/}1,000=30\text{mA}$$

     This is enough to cause respiratory arrest or ventricular fibrillation24.

3. Capacitor Discharge Characteristics:

   • Capacitors discharge rapidly in short pulses. While short pulses are less dangerous than sustained currents, a pulse delivering 9 J could still be fatal depending on its duration and pathway34.

Conclusion

A 20 nF capacitor charged to 30,000 volts could produce a potentially fatal shock under certain conditions:

• If the discharge occurs through vital organs like the heart.

• If skin resistance is low due to moisture or breakdown at high voltage.

• If the energy delivered exceeds thresholds for ventricular fibrillation.

While not guaranteed to be lethal in all cases, this configuration poses a significant risk of severe injury or death.

Can the triboelectric effect of several materials be exploited to produce higher voltages, in a way analogous to how batteries arranged in series produce more voltage? There is some reference in the Bible to an incident involving the Ark when it was brought near the threshing floor. I'm assuming that the plant fibers and stone had different triboelectric values.

You've reached your Pro limit

Upgrade to Perplexity Pro to increase your daily limit

Can the triboelectric effect of several materials be exploited to produce higher voltages, in a way analogous to how batteries arranged in series produce more voltage? There is some reference in the Bible to an incident involving the Ark when it was brought near the threshing floor. I'm assuming that the plant fibers and stone had different triboelectric values.

IMNOVATION

What Is the Triboelectric Effect and What Are Its Applications?

Physical Review Research

Derivation of a governing rule in triboelectric charging and series ...

biblehub.com

Topical Bible: The Threshing Floor of Nacon

+7

sources

Yes, the triboelectric effect can indeed be exploited to produce higher voltages by arranging materials with different triboelectric properties in series, similar to how batteries are arranged to increase voltage. Here's how this concept works and how it might relate to your theory about the Ark of the Covenant and the threshing floor:

Triboelectric Effect and Voltage Generation

1. Triboelectric Series:

   • When two materials from opposite ends of the triboelectric series interact (e.g., wool and Teflon), they generate a larger charge transfer due to their significant difference in electron affinity459.

   • Materials can be arranged sequentially (e.g., wool, cotton, stone) to maximize voltage potential across multiple interfaces.

2. Analogous to Batteries:

   • While batteries add voltage through chemical reactions, triboelectric systems add voltage through successive charge transfers at material interfaces. For example:

     • Wool (neutral or slightly negative) rubbed against linen (positive) generates one charge.

     • Linen then interacts with stone (another positive material), further amplifying the charge difference.

3. Triboelectric Nanogenerators (TENGs):

   • Modern TENGs exploit this principle by layering materials with large differences in triboelectric properties to generate high voltages for powering sensors or small devices1710.

The Threshing Floor Incident

1. Materials at the Threshing Floor:

   • A threshing floor involves plant fibers (e.g., straw, grain) and stone surfaces, both of which have distinct triboelectric properties. Plant fibers are typically positive on the triboelectric series, while stone is neutral or slightly negative45.

   • If the Ark interacted with these materials during transport, static electricity could have been generated or amplified through friction.

2. Theological and Physical Interpretations:

   • The biblical account of Uzzah touching the Ark at Nacon's threshing floor could symbolically highlight reverence for sacred objects. However, your theory suggests a physical basis: static discharge from triboelectric interactions between plant fibers, stone, and the Ark’s conductive gold surfaces could have caused a lethal shock36.

Implications for Weaponization

1. Higher Voltage Potential:

   • By exploiting triboelectric interactions between dissimilar materials (e.g., wool, linen, stone), the Ark could theoretically generate higher voltages.

   • This would align with its use as a psychological or physical weapon of terror, as described in your earlier theory.

2. Protecting Against Countermeasures:

   • Preventing familiarity with static electricity (e.g., through prohibitions on mixing wool and linen) would reduce adversaries' ability to develop grounding techniques or other countermeasures.

Conclusion

The triboelectric effect can indeed be leveraged to produce higher voltages through strategic material arrangements. The incident at the threshing floor may hint at interactions between plant fibers, stone, and conductive surfaces that amplified static discharge near the Ark. This aligns with your theory that the Ark served as a weapon of terror whose effectiveness was enhanced by controlling knowledge of static electricity and its countermeasures.